When you undergo a medical procedure or rely on a medical device to improve your health, you trust that the device has been safely designed, properly manufactured, and thoroughly tested for safety. Unfortunately, defective medical devices continue to cause serious injuries and complications for patients across New York and the United States. From faulty hip implants and defective pacemakers to contaminated surgical instruments and dangerous transvaginal mesh, defective medical devices can cause devastating harm that changes lives forever.
Were You Injured By A Defective Medical Device In New York?
CONTACT USOur Recent Case Results
Settlement
Jury Verdict
Settlement
Settlement
If you've been injured by a defective medical device, you may be wondering whether you can recover compensation for your injuries and suffering. The answer is often yes. New York's product liability laws provide multiple avenues for patients to seek compensation when medical devices fail to perform as intended or cause unexpected harm.
Understanding your legal rights and options is crucial for protecting your interests and obtaining the compensation you deserve for your injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. If you’ve been injured due to a defective medical device in New York, don’t hesitate to reach out to the experienced personal injury attorneys at the Porter Law Group for a free, no-obligation consultation.
Understanding Medical Device Defects
Medical devices include a wide range of products used in healthcare, from simple bandages and syringes to complex implantable devices like artificial joints, cardiac stents, and insulin pumps. The FDA classifies medical devices into three categories based on their risk level, with Class III devices requiring the most rigorous premarket approval due to their life-sustaining or life-supporting nature.
Despite regulatory oversight, medical device defects still occur at an alarming rate. These defects can take several forms, each presenting unique challenges for patients and their legal representatives. Understanding the type of defects involved is critical in determining whether you have a valid claim for compensation.
Design Defects
Design defects are inherent flaws in how a medical device was engineered, affecting every unit manufactured according to the flawed design. These issues are particularly hazardous because they expose large numbers of patients to risk. A design defect exists when the product's structure poses unreasonable risks that could have been avoided through a safer, feasible alternative design.
Examples of design defects include hernia mesh made with porous material that leads to chronic inflammation and tissue erosion, artificial hip joints with metal-on-metal components that release toxic metal particles into the bloodstream, and breast implants with textured surfaces that increase the risk of a rare form of cancer. In these cases, the problem lies not in manufacturing but in the fundamental design.
Manufacturing Defects
Manufacturing defects occur during the production process when individual devices deviate from their intended design specifications. Unlike design defects that affect entire product lines, manufacturing defects typically impact specific batches or individual units. These defects are often harder to detect and difficult to prove because they may not become evident until the device malfunctions or causes harm.
Common manufacturing defects include contaminated batches of surgical instruments, pacemakers with faulty electrical components due to poor quality control, and insulin pumps delivering incorrect dosages due to software errors. Manufacturing defects often result from inadequate quality control processes, contaminated raw materials, or errors in the assembly process.
Failure to Warn
Failure to warn cases, also known as marketing defects, arise when manufacturers do not provide sufficient warnings or instructions about a device’s risks. Even well-designed and properly manufactured devices can be unreasonably dangerous if patients and healthcare providers aren't properly informed about potential risks, contraindications, or proper usage procedures.
Recent examples include breast implants lacking adequate warnings about cancer risks, transvaginal mesh devices without sufficient information about erosion and complications, and CPAP machines with inadequate warnings about foam degradation that can cause respiratory injuries. These cases often involve manufacturers who knew or should have known about the dangers but failed to provide adequate warnings to patients and healthcare providers.
Legal Theories for Defective Medical Device Claims in New York
New York law provides several legal theories that patients can use to pursue compensation for injuries caused by defective medical devices. Each theory has different requirements and advantages, and experienced attorneys often pursue multiple theories simultaneously to maximize the chances of success.
Strict Liability
Strict liability is often the most powerful tool for patients injured by defective medical devices because it doesn't require proving that the manufacturer was negligent or careless. Under New York's strict liability doctrine, patients need only demonstrate four key elements:
- The defendant was in the business of manufacturing or distributing the device.
- The device was defective (by design, manufacturing, or failure to warn).
- The defect directly caused the injury.
- The device was not significantly altered after leaving the manufacturer’s control.
For example, if a pacemaker has a design defect causing premature battery failure, the patient can pursue strict liability claims without needing to prove that the manufacturer was careless in designing the device. The focus is on whether the device was unreasonably dangerous, not on the manufacturer's conduct.
Negligence Claims
Negligence claims focus on whether manufacturers failed to use reasonable care in designing, producing, testing, or labeling their devices. To succeed on a negligence claim, patients must prove that the manufacturer owed them a duty of care, breached that duty through substandard practices, and that the breach directly caused their injuries.
Negligence claims can be particularly effective when evidence shows that manufacturers knew about problems with their devices but failed to take appropriate action. For instance, if internal company documents reveal that a manufacturer was aware of high failure rates but continued selling the device without modifications or warnings, this could support a strong negligence claim.
Breach of Warranty
Warranty claims arise under the Uniform Commercial Code when medical devices fail to meet express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Express warranties are specific promises or representations made by manufacturers about their devices' performance or safety. Implied warranties are legal guarantees that devices will be suitable for their intended purpose and free from defects.
Breach of warranty claims offer a significant advantage in terms of timing, as New York allows four years to file these claims compared to the standard three-year limit for personal injury cases. This extended timeframe can be crucial for patients who don't immediately realize their injuries were caused by defective devices.
Critical Timing Issues and Statutes of Limitations
Understanding the time limits for filing medical device lawsuits is crucial because missing these deadlines can forever bar your claim, regardless of how strong your case might be. New York has specific statutes of limitations that vary depending on the type of claim and circumstances involved.
Standard Limitation Periods
For personal injury claims involving defective medical devices, New York imposes a three-year statute of limitations measured from the date of injury discovery. This means the clock typically starts running when you first discover your injury, not necessarily when the defective device was implanted or used.
Wrongful death cases have a two-year limitation period from the date of death, though this can be extended to six years if the death is linked to a breach of warranty claim. The longer warranty period can provide additional options for families whose loved ones died due to defective medical devices.
Latent Injury Protections
Many medical device injuries don't become apparent immediately after implantation or use. Recognizing this reality, New York's Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 214-c provides special protections for latent injuries. Under this statute, the limitation period begins when the injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, with a one-year extension if the cause is identified within five years of discovery.
For example, if a patient discovers organ damage from a transvaginal mesh implant in 2025, they could file suit until 2028, even if the original surgery occurred in 2020. This protection is crucial for patients whose injuries develop gradually over time or aren't immediately recognizable as being caused by defective devices.
The Challenge of FDA Preemption
One of the most significant challenges in medical device litigation is the potential for federal preemption of state law claims. Under the Supreme Court's decision in Riegel v. Medtronic, medical devices that receive premarket approval (PMA) from the FDA may be protected from state law product liability claims. Manufacturers often argue that compliance with federal FDA standards should bar state liability claims, contending that allowing such claims would undermine the federal regulatory scheme.
However, experienced attorneys can overcome preemption defenses by demonstrating violations of FDA regulations or showing that state law claims are parallel to, rather than in conflict with, federal requirements.
The preemption landscape continues to evolve, and many devices that initially appeared to be protected have subsequently been found subject to state law claims. Working with attorneys who understand the complexities of FDA preemption is essential for navigating these challenges successfully. If you’ve suffered harm due to a defective medical device, reach out to the Porter Law Group today, and learn more about your legal options in a free consultation. We work on a contingency fee basis, so unless we secure a favorable outcome, you won’t owe us any fees.
Proving Your Medical Device Case
Successfully proving a defective medical device case requires demonstrating several key elements through careful investigation and expert testimony. The complexity of these cases demands thorough preparation and substantial resources to compete against well-funded device manufacturers.
Establishing the Defect
Proving that a medical device was defective requires extensive investigation into the device's design, manufacturing process, and safety testing. This often involves obtaining internal company documents, FDA submissions, clinical trial data, and communications between the manufacturer and regulators.
Expert witnesses play a crucial role in explaining complex medical and engineering concepts to judges and juries. These experts can testify about alternative safer designs, industry standards, and whether the manufacturer's conduct fell below acceptable standards.
Proving Causation
Establishing that the defective device caused your specific injuries is often the most challenging aspect of these cases. Manufacturers frequently argue that injuries resulted from the patient's underlying medical condition, surgical complications unrelated to the device, or other intervening causes.
Medical experts must carefully review your medical records, imaging studies, and other evidence to establish a clear link between the defective device and your injuries. This often requires ruling out other potential causes and demonstrating that your injuries are consistent with known complications from the defective device.
Types of Compensation Available
Patients injured by defective medical devices can recover several types of damages that reflect the full scope of their injuries and losses. Unlike some other areas of law, medical device cases often involve substantial damages that can provide meaningful compensation for life-changing injuries.
Economic Damages
Economic damages include all quantifiable financial losses resulting from the defective device. This encompasses past and future medical expenses, including surgery to remove or replace the defective device, ongoing treatment for complications, rehabilitation costs, and prescription medications.
Lost wages and diminished earning capacity are also recoverable, reflecting both time missed from work and any permanent reduction in your ability to earn income. For severe injuries, these economic damages can reach hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars over a lifetime.
Non-Economic Damages
Non-economic damages compensate for the physical pain, emotional suffering, and diminished quality of life caused by defective medical devices. These damages recognize that the impact of a defective device extends far beyond financial losses to affect every aspect of your daily life.
Pain and suffering damages can be substantial in medical device cases, particularly when devices cause chronic pain, require multiple surgeries, or result in permanent disabilities. Loss of enjoyment of life damages compensate for your inability to participate in activities you previously enjoyed.
Punitive Damages
In cases involving particularly egregious conduct, such as manufacturers knowingly selling dangerous devices or concealing known risks, punitive damages may be available. These damages are designed to punish wrongdoers and deter similar conduct in the future.
Recent cases involving manufacturers who continued selling devices despite knowing about serious safety problems have resulted in significant punitive damage awards, sending a clear message that such conduct will not be tolerated.
Complex Litigation Considerations
Medical device litigation often involves unique procedural and strategic considerations that distinguish these cases from other types of personal injury claims.
Multi-Defendant Actions
Medical device lawsuits frequently involve multiple defendants, including manufacturers, distributors, hospitals, and sometimes physicians. While healthcare providers generally face medical malpractice claims rather than product liability claims, they may share liability if they promoted defective devices or used them inappropriately without proper warnings.
Coordinating claims against multiple defendants requires careful strategic planning to avoid conflicts and ensure that all responsible parties are held accountable for their roles in causing your injuries.
Mass Torts and Class Actions
Cases involving widely distributed devices like hip implants, IVC filters, or transvaginal mesh may be consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) or mass tort proceedings. These consolidated cases allow for streamlined discovery and can provide efficiency benefits for both plaintiffs and defendants.
However, mass tort litigation also presents unique challenges, including the need to demonstrate that your specific injuries were caused by the common defect rather than individual factors. Experienced attorneys understand how to navigate these complex proceedings while protecting your individual interests.
Injury claims arising from defective medical devices are highly complex. And on top of that, you are potentially going up against big corporations with deep pockets and teams of lawyers who will try to get you to settle for as low as possible. Do not let yourself be shortchanged. Contact us today, and let us help you evaluate the best course of action. View the results we’ve achieved for previous clients, and see why so many New Yorkers have trusted us for decades.
Suffering from an Injury Caused by a Defective Medical Device in New York?
Reach out to our experienced team for a free consultation.
Why Choose the Porter Law Group
The lawyers at the Porter Law Group have decades of experience representing individuals and families whose lives have been devastated by catastrophic injuries. We have obtained some of the largest settlements and verdicts in courts throughout the State of New York. We are a state-wide firm that handles cases with a hometown feel.
Our clients come to us looking for guidance and answers. With seasoned trial lawyers, the Porter Law Group has the resources necessary to help you navigate the most complex cases, against goliath insurance companies that will stop at nothing to prevent you from receiving the compensation you deserve.
You only get one chance to hire the best lawyer for you and your family. Hire the lawyers most recommended by former clients and local attorneys, and the firm that obtains superior results.
When you or a loved one's life has been devastated by a serious personal injury in New York, don't hire a lawyer without calling the Porter Law Group to learn why so many of our clients are thankful they trusted us with their case in their time of need.
Contact a New York Medical Device Injury Attorney Today
If you've been injured by a defective medical device, time is of the essence. The complex intersection of product liability law, FDA regulations, and medical evidence requires immediate attention from experienced legal professionals who understand the unique challenges of these cases.
At the Porter Law Group, we offer free, no-obligation consultations to evaluate your case and explain your legal options. We work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are no attorney fees unless we win your case. This allows you to pursue the compensation you deserve without worrying about upfront legal costs.
Don't let the medical device manufacturers and their insurance companies take advantage of you during this difficult time. Contact the Porter Law Group today at 833-PORTER9 or email info@porterlawteam.com to schedule your free consultation. Let our experienced New York medical device attorneys fight for the full compensation you deserve while you focus on your recovery and healing.
