In New York, parents generally have until their child’s tenth birthday to file a birth injury lawsuit on the child’s behalf, while their own personal claims must be filed within 2 years and 6 months of the malpractice. The deadline is much shorter against public hospitals, where a Notice of Claim must be served within 90 days under General Municipal Law § 50-e and the lawsuit filed within 1 year and 90 days. The continuous treatment doctrine, codified at CPLR § 214-a and rooted in the Court of Appeals decision in Borgia v. City of New York, 12 N.Y.2d 151 (1962), can extend the deadline when the same provider has continued treating the same condition. Determining the correct deadline depends on who the defendant is, when the injury was discovered, and whether the child was injured during pregnancy or delivery.
If you are trying to determine whether you still have time to file a birth injury lawsuit in New York, call Porter Law Group at 833-PORTER9 for a free, confidential case review.
Birth Injury Caused by Negligence?
CONTACT USOur Recent Case Results
Settlement
Jury Verdict
Settlement
Settlement
What Is the Statute of Limitations for a Birth Injury in New York?
The statute of limitations is the legal deadline for filing a lawsuit. Miss it, and the case is dismissed regardless of how strong the evidence is. New York’s medical malpractice statute of limitations is set out in CPLR § 214-a, which gives plaintiffs 2 years and 6 months from the date of the malpractice (or from the end of continuous treatment for the same condition) to file. That is the default rule.
For birth injury cases specifically, the rules are more favorable to the family, because two layers of additional protection apply.
The first layer is the infancy toll under CPLR § 208. When the injured patient is a minor at the time of the malpractice, the statute of limitations is paused (tolled) during the minor's infancy. For medical malpractice claims, that pause is capped at 10 years from the date of the malpractice. In practical terms, a child injured at birth has until the tenth anniversary of the malpractice to file the lawsuit, regardless of when the parents discovered the injury.
The second layer is the continuous treatment doctrine, also codified at CPLR § 214-a, which applies when the same provider has continued treating the same condition after the alleged malpractice.
The two layers do not stack. As the Court of Appeals held in Daniel J. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, 77 N.Y.2d 630 (1991), the 10-year infancy cap runs from the date of the negligent act, not from the end of continuous treatment. That distinction matters for cases involving long courses of post-natal pediatric care.
| Type of Claim | Deadline | Statute |
| Child's medical malpractice claim against private defendants | Up to 10 years from the date of malpractice | CPLR § 208 (infancy toll) |
| Parents' personal claims for their own damages | 2 years 6 months from the malpractice or end of continuous treatment | CPLR § 214-a |
| Wrongful death | 2 years from the date of death | EPTL § 5-4.1 |
| Foreign object left in body | 1 year from discovery | CPLR § 214-a(a) |
| Cancer or malignant tumor misdiagnosis (Lavern's Law) | 2 years 6 months from discovery, capped at 7 years | CPLR § 214-a(b) |
| Notice of Claim against municipal hospital | 90 days from the malpractice | GML § 50-e |
| Lawsuit against municipal hospital | 1 year 90 days from the malpractice | GML § 50-i |
| Notice of Intention against state hospital (SUNY) | 90 days from accrual | Court of Claims Act § 10(3) |
| Lawsuit against state hospital | 2 years from accrual (with timely Notice of Intention) | Court of Claims Act § 10(3) |
| Federal facility (VA, military) | 2 years administrative claim under FTCA | 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) |
When Does the Clock Start in a New York Birth Injury Case?
The deadline is only as good as the date it starts running from. New York courts have answered three versions of the accrual question that come up in birth injury cases.
For a child injured during labor and delivery, the cause of action accrues on the date of the negligent act or omission. The infancy toll starts on the date of live birth.
For a child injured by negligent prenatal care, accrual is delayed until live birth. The Court of Appeals held in LaBello v. Albany Medical Center Hospital, 85 N.Y.2d 701 (1995), that "a cause of action for medical malpractice premised on faulty prenatal care and consequent injuries accrues at live birth." The reasoning is straightforward: an unborn fetus has no legal capacity to sue, so the cause of action cannot accrue until the moment the child has an independent legal existence. This is a critical point for cases where harm originated in genetic counseling, prenatal monitoring, or treatment of conditions like preeclampsia or gestational diabetes during pregnancy.
For a child whose injury was made worse by post-delivery negligence, each act of negligence has its own accrual date, but the continuous treatment doctrine may collapse multiple acts into a single accrual point at the end of treatment. Daniel J. makes clear, however, that the 10-year infancy cap continues to run from the date of the original negligent act, not from the end of continuous treatment.
For the parents' own claims, the clock starts on the date of the parents' injury, which is typically the same date as the malpractice on the child. The infancy toll does not benefit the parents' personal claims, which is why parents are typically running on the standard 2.5-year clock under CPLR § 214-a even when the child has up to 10 years.
How Does the Continuous Treatment Doctrine Extend the Deadline?
The continuous treatment doctrine can be the difference between a viable case and a dismissed one. It is also the most misunderstood timing concept in New York medical malpractice law.
The doctrine originated with the New York Court of Appeals decision in Borgia v. City of New York, 12 N.Y.2d 151 (1962). The plaintiff in Borgia was a child who suffered brain damage at birth and was hospitalized continuously for more than 16 months at a New York City public hospital. The negligent acts occurred on four separate dates spanning more than a year. By the time the family was prepared to file, more than 90 days had passed since the last act of malpractice, and the City moved to dismiss based on the General Municipal Law § 50-e Notice of Claim deadline.
The Court of Appeals refused to dismiss. Writing for the Court, Judge Fuld explained that "when the course of treatment which includes the wrongful acts or omissions has run continuously and is related to the same original condition or complaint, the 'accrual' comes only at the end of the treatment." The reason is one of basic fairness: it would be absurd to require a wronged patient to interrupt corrective efforts by serving a summons on the doctor or hospital that is still trying to fix the problem.
The Legislature codified the doctrine in 1975 as part of CPLR § 214-a, which now provides that medical malpractice actions must be commenced within 2 years and 6 months of "the act, omission or failure complained of or last treatment where there is continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition which gave rise to the said act, omission or failure."
What counts as "continuous treatment"
The Court of Appeals defined the term narrowly in Borgia itself, explaining that the continuous treatment it had in mind was "treatment for the same or related illnesses or injuries, continuing after the alleged acts of malpractice, not mere continuity of a general physician-patient relationship." Subsequent Court of Appeals cases have refined the standard:
- A routine annual checkup, scheduled at the patient's own initiative, does not extend the deadline (Curcio v. Ippolito, 63 N.Y.2d 967 (1984)).
- Treatment for an unrelated condition with the same provider does not count (Nykorchuck v. Henriques, 78 N.Y.2d 255 (1991)).
- Long gaps between visits can break continuity unless the parties intended the patient's continued reliance on the provider's ongoing oversight (Lohnas v. Luzi, 30 N.Y.3d 1085 (2018)).
In a birth injury case, the doctrine most often applies in three scenarios:
- The mother's prenatal care continued with the same obstetrician through delivery and post-delivery follow-up.
- The newborn’s neonatal intensive care and pediatric follow-up at the same hospital extended the period during which the original injury could be addressed.
- The pediatrician who was on duty at delivery continued treating the child for the resulting condition.
Whether the doctrine applies in any given case is heavily fact-specific. The dates of every prenatal visit, every delivery procedure, and every post-natal pediatric encounter are relevant evidence.
Why Is the 90-Day Deadline Against Public Hospitals So Important?
The toughest deadline in New York birth injury practice is the 90-day Notice of Claim against public hospitals. It applies to NYC Health + Hospitals (NYC H+H, which operates Bellevue, Elmhurst, Jacobi, Kings County, Lincoln, Metropolitan, North Central Bronx, Queens, and other facilities), to county and municipal hospitals such as Nassau University Medical Center, and to other public corporations.
Under General Municipal Law § 50-e, the Notice of Claim must be served on the hospital corporation within 90 days of the malpractice. The Notice itself is a written document, sworn before a notary, that states the nature of the claim, the time and place of the injury, and the items of damage. Under General Municipal Law § 50-i, the lawsuit itself must be commenced within 1 year and 90 days of the malpractice.
There is one mitigating rule. The infancy toll under CPLR § 208 still applies to the underlying lawsuit deadline. Under the medical malpractice carve-out in CPLR § 208, the toll caps at 10 years from accrual for the child's medical malpractice claim. The Court of Appeals held in Henry v. City of New York, 94 N.Y.2d 275 (1999), that the infancy toll is not nullified by a parent or guardian's compliance with the Notice of Claim requirement, so the child's underlying claim against a public hospital remains protected by the toll even after a Notice is filed. But the 90-day Notice of Claim deadline itself is treated by the courts as a separate, threshold procedural requirement. Missing it is often fatal to the case unless leave is granted to file a late Notice.
The late Notice of Claim procedure
GML § 50-e(5) authorizes the court to grant leave to serve a late Notice of Claim. The application must be made within the underlying statute of limitations period. In considering whether to grant leave, the court weighs:
- Whether the public corporation acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts within 90 days or a reasonable time thereafter.
- Whether the delay substantially prejudiced the defense.
- Whether the claimant has a reasonable excuse for the delay.
Courts give significant weight to actual knowledge. The Court of Appeals held in Williams v. Nassau County Medical Center, 6 N.Y.3d 531 (2006), that mere possession of the medical records is not by itself enough to establish actual knowledge if the records do not reflect that the medical staff inflicted any injury. Subsequent Second Department decisions, including Matter of Breslin v. Nassau Health Care Corp., 153 A.D.3d 1256 (2d Dep't 2017), and J.H. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 169 A.D.3d 880 (2d Dep't 2019), have refined the rule, holding that where the alleged malpractice is apparent from an independent review of the medical records, those records can constitute actual knowledge of the facts constituting the claim. In a birth injury case, where the hospital has the complete prenatal, labor, delivery, and neonatal record, an experienced attorney can often identify and present the specific record entries that satisfy this standard.
The application for leave to file a late Notice is not a substitute for filing on time. Even where leave is granted, the mere fact of the late filing introduces uncertainty that hospitals leverage at the negotiation table. Filing within 90 days, when possible, removes that variable from the case.
Does Lavern's Law Apply to Birth Injuries?
No. This question comes up because Lavern's Law (the 2018 amendment to CPLR § 214-a) is the most discussed development in New York medical malpractice timing in recent years. But the statute is narrowly drafted.
The text of CPLR § 214-a(b) limits the discovery rule to actions “based upon the alleged negligent failure to diagnose cancer or a malignant tumor.” Birth injury cases involve hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE),brachial plexus injury, traumatic injury during delivery, and other conditions that are not cancer. The discovery rule under Lavern’s Law is therefore unavailable in birth injury cases.
For a deeper explanation of Lavern's Law and how it applies to cancer cases, see Porter Law Group's Lavern's Law explainer.
What Lavern's Law does NOT change: the standard 2.5-year statute under CPLR § 214-a, the infancy toll under CPLR § 208, the continuous treatment doctrine, the foreign object discovery rule, or the General Municipal Law and Court of Claims Act deadlines for public hospitals. All of those continue to govern non-cancer cases, including every birth injury case.
How Long Do Birth Injury Cases Take After Filing?
This is a separate question from the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations governs the deadline to file the lawsuit. Once the lawsuit is filed, the case enters its own timeline of pleadings, discovery, expert review, depositions, motion practice, and either settlement or trial.
A typical New York birth injury case takes 18 to 36 months from filing to resolution. Catastrophic-injury cases involving permanent neurological damage, multiple defendants, or contested causation can take longer. Several factors drive the timeline:
Discovery is the longest phase. Birth injury discovery includes the production of the prenatal record, the labor and delivery record (including continuous fetal monitoring strips, which can reveal oxygen deprivation during labor), the newborn record, the NICU record, and the pediatric and developmental follow-up records. The plaintiff’s attorney typically takes the depositions of the obstetrician, anesthesiologist, labor and delivery nurses, neonatologists, and other medical staff present during delivery including, where applicable, those involved in assisted deliveries using forceps or vacuum extraction. The defendants take the depositions of the parents and the plaintiff’s medical experts.
Expert workup runs parallel to discovery. Birth injury cases require expert opinion from a maternal-fetal medicine specialist, neonatologist, pediatric neurologist, and life care planner. Each expert must review the complete record, render a written opinion, and prepare for deposition and trial testimony.
Motion practice can extend the timeline. Hospital defendants in birth injury cases routinely move for summary judgment on the question of vicarious liability, the proper standard of care, or the applicability of res ipsa loquitur. Frye hearings on novel scientific evidence can add additional months. For more on the evidentiary mechanics, see Porter Law Group's article on how to prove a birth injury was caused by medical negligence.
Mediation and settlement typically occur after expert exchange and before trial. Most New York birth injury cases settle, often after extensive negotiation around the projected lifetime cost of the child's care.
Trial is the longest single component of any case that does not settle. Birth injury trials in New York typically run 3 to 6 weeks, depending on the number of defendants and the complexity of the medical issues.
For families managing the day-to-day care of an injured child, the long timeline is one of the most difficult aspects of the case. An experienced birth injury attorney handles the procedural workload while the family focuses on the child.
Talk to a Birth Injury Lawyer Today
Get a free consultation to discuss your birth injury case, legal options, and the compensation you may be entitled to pursue.
Frequently Asked Questions About New York Birth Injury Deadlines
How long do parents have to file a birth injury lawsuit in New York?
For the child's claim, parents acting as guardian ad litem can file up to 10 years from the date of the malpractice, under the infancy toll in CPLR § 208. For the parents' own personal claims (medical expenses paid on the child's behalf, loss of services, emotional distress in qualifying cases), the standard 2 years and 6 months under CPLR § 214-a applies. The shorter parental deadline runs even if the child still has time to sue, so parents who wait too long can lose their own claims while preserving the child's.
What if the malpractice happened years ago and my child is now 8 or 9 years old?
The infancy toll under CPLR § 208 keeps the child's claim open up to 10 years from the date of the malpractice. If your child is approaching the 10-year anniversary, contact a New York birth injury attorney immediately. Building the medical case takes weeks or months, and the Certificate of Merit under CPLR § 3012-a must be filed with the complaint based on a qualified physician's review of the records. Waiting until the final months before the deadline is risky.
How long do I have to file against NYC Health + Hospitals for a birth injury?
A Notice of Claim must be served on NYC Health + Hospitals within 90 days of the malpractice under General Municipal Law § 50-e. The lawsuit must then be commenced within 1 year and 90 days under General Municipal Law § 50-i. The infancy toll under CPLR § 208 extends the underlying lawsuit deadline up to 10 years for the child's claim, but it does NOT relieve you of the 90-day Notice requirement, which is treated as a separate procedural step.
Can I file a late Notice of Claim against a public hospital?
Sometimes. GML § 50-e(5) allows the court to grant leave to serve a late Notice of Claim if the application is made within the underlying statute of limitations. Courts consider whether the hospital had actual knowledge of the essential facts (often satisfied by the medical records themselves), whether the delay prejudiced the defense, and whether there is a reasonable excuse for the delay. The procedure is discretionary, not automatic.
Does the continuous treatment doctrine apply to birth injuries?
Yes, in some cases. The continuous treatment doctrine, established in Borgia v. City of New York and codified at CPLR § 214-a, can extend the statute of limitations when the same provider continues treating the same condition after the alleged malpractice. In birth injury practice, the doctrine most often applies when the mother’s prenatal care continued with the same obstetrician, when the newborn’s neonatal care extended at the same hospital, or when a pediatrician who was present at delivery continued treating the child.
Does Lavern's Law apply to birth injury cases?
No. Lavern’s Law is the 2018 amendment to CPLR § 214-a that created a discovery rule for cancer and malignant tumor misdiagnosis cases. The statutory text is limited to those specific conditions. Birth injuries including HIE, cerebral palsy, brachial plexus injury, and delivery room injuries are not within Lavern’s Law. The standard 2.5-year statute, the infancy toll, and the continuous treatment doctrine all continue to govern.
When does the clock start if my child was injured during prenatal care?
The Court of Appeals held in LaBello v. Albany Medical Center Hospital, 85 N.Y.2d 701 (1995), that a medical malpractice cause of action premised on negligent prenatal care accrues at live birth, because the unborn fetus has no legal capacity to sue. The 10-year infancy cap then runs from the date of birth.
What is the deadline for a wrongful death claim if my baby did not survive?
A wrongful death action under EPTL § 5-4.1 must be filed by the personal representative of the child’s estate within 2 years of the date of death. Note that this is 2 years, not 2 years and 6 months. A separate survival action under EPTL § 11-3.2 may also be available for the child’s conscious pain and suffering before death, governed by the underlying medical malpractice statute.
How long does a birth injury case actually take from filing to settlement?
A typical New York birth injury case takes 18 to 36 months from filing to resolution. Catastrophic injury cases with multiple defendants and contested causation can take longer. The longest single phase is discovery, which includes the production of voluminous medical records and the depositions of every obstetric, anesthesia, nursing, and neonatology provider involved in care. Most cases settle before trial.
What happens if I miss the statute of limitations?
The case is dismissed. New York courts apply the medical malpractice statute of limitations strictly and have very limited discretion to extend it. The narrow exceptions (foreign object discovery, cancer misdiagnosis under Lavern's Law, infancy, insanity) are statutorily defined. Outside those exceptions, missing the deadline ends the case regardless of how strong the evidence is or how serious the injury.
Should I wait until my child is older to see how the injury develops before filing?
No. Waiting is one of the most common mistakes families make. The Certificate of Merit required under CPLR § 3012-a must be filed at the start of the case, but it is based on the medical records, not on the long-term prognosis. A life care planner can project the child's future needs at any age, and updating those projections is part of the normal preparation for trial. Waiting risks the loss of evidence, the unavailability of witnesses, and most critically, missing the statute of limitations.
How Porter Law Group Handles Birth Injury Deadlines for New York Families
Porter Law Group has recovered more than $500 million for seriously injured New York clients, with multiple seven- and eight-figure birth injury settlements and verdicts. The firm's intake process for birth injury cases begins with the deadline analysis. Identifying the proper defendant determines which statute applies. Identifying the dates of prenatal care, delivery, and post-natal follow-up determines whether the continuous treatment doctrine applies. Identifying the type of facility (private, NYC H+H, SUNY, federal) determines whether a 90-day Notice deadline is already running.
The firm has offices in Syracuse, Rochester, Buffalo, Albany, New York City, and Saratoga Springs, and serves families throughout New York State. To speak with a New York birth injury lawyer about your child's case before a deadline runs out, call 833-PORTER9 or email info@porterlawteam.com. The consultation is free, and Porter Law Group works on contingency.
For related reading, see Porter Law Group's common questions about birth injury lawsuits in New York and how to start a medical malpractice lawsuit in New York State.
