Legal Guide

How New York’s Comparative Negligence Rule Affects Car Accident Claims in NYC

Last Updated on Originally published March 28, 2024

New York is a No-Fault state. This means that individual insurance policies typically cover any damages incurred during a car accident. However, in cases involving serious injuries and extreme property damages, negligent drivers can be pursued for further compensation.

At the same time, it is important to note that not all accidents are caused solely by one person – and this is where the concept of comparative negligence comes in.

According to the New York City Comptroller, car crashes contributed to 20% of all personal injury claims in 2022. Available data also indicate that personal injury claims from car accidents were compensated with $94,173 on average in 2022.

Looking for Compensation after a Car Accident?

Reach out to our team to know your options (100% free)

Understanding Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence can be cited against both pedestrians and drivers. This principle helps determine how much a seriously injured party contributed to an accident – determining the final compensation they are eligible for. This means that if an injured individual is found to have contributed to 30% of the accident, they will only receive 70% of the original compensation (all damages** incurred accounted for).
**Emotional, financial, and medical damages should be accounted for when seeking compensation

Comparative negligence can also be cited in other cases involving medical malpractice, slip-and-fall accidents, workplace accidents, and product liability.

Contributory Negligence vs. Comparative Negligence

Contributory negligence is an old concept that often led to harsh outcomes for parties who were minimally at fault. Under this rule, any person found to be even 1% at fault in an accident was barred from getting compensation. 

In 1957, the state of New York adopted the comparative negligence rule – providing a more balanced approach to penalizing negligent victims and allowing them to recuperate. 

Provisions Relevant to Comparative Negligence

Traffic laws are considered when evaluating comparative negligence in car accident cases. Any violations by either party can be used as evidence to establish negligence and determine the degree of their fault.

When determining comparative fault, these provisions are relevant:

Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1163This section deals with turning movements and required signals. It states that drivers must use the appropriate turn signal when turning or changing lanes and that they must yield the right-of-way to other vehicles and pedestrians when turning.
Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180This section covers speed restrictions and requires drivers to maintain a speed that is reasonable and prudent under the conditions, taking into account factors such as weather, visibility, and traffic.
Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1122This section addresses overtaking and passing other vehicles. It specifies when it is legal to pass another vehicle and requires drivers to maintain a safe distance when doing so.
Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129This section deals with following too closely and prohibits drivers from following another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent.


Traffic rules are set to ensure that roads are safe for everyone – motorists and pedestrians included. Following traffic rules is one very effective way to avoid comparative negligence.

Need More Information on Comparative Negligence?

Our legal team offers free consultations

Determining Comparative Fault in a Car Accident Claim

Much like drivers, pedestrians are also subject to traffic laws. Some common instances where an injured pedestrian might be found partially at fault include:

  • Jaywalking: For pedestrians crossing the street outside of a marked crosswalk or against a traffic signal
  • Distracted walking: For pedestrians distracted by their phones, headphones, or other devices
  • Intoxication: For pedestrians under the influence of alcohol or drugs
  • Darting out into traffic: For pedestrians suddenly entering a roadway without giving a driver sufficient time to react
  • Walking in prohibited areas: For pedestrians walking on highways, bridges, or other areas pedestrians shouldn’t access
  • Wearing dark clothing at night: For pedestrians wearing dark clothing and walking in a poorly lit area at night

Still, seriously injured individuals deserve as much compensation as they can get. Through proper compensation, injured individuals are allowed to rebuild themselves after an accident. As such, it’d be best if car accident victims coordinate with personal injury lawyers as soon as possible.

Talk to a Personal Injury Lawyer Today

At the Porter Law Group, we make sure that individuals in need are rightfully compensated. We take pride in aiding families recuperating from adverse incidents. Working on a contingency basis, our clients do not pay anything unless we win.
If you were seriously injured in a car accident, please reach out for a no-obligation, free consultation. You may also contact us at 833-PORTER9 or info@porterlawteam.com to schedule an appointment.

New York Car Accidents Motor Vehicle Accidents New York City Pedestrian Accidents

The experts behind this article

Every Porter Law Group guide is written and reviewed by experienced New York personal injury attorneys.

Eric C. Nordby
Written By
Eric C. Nordby
Personal Injury Attorney

Eric, with nearly three decades of experience in personal injury litigation, holds a law degree with honors from the University at Buffalo School of Law and a Bachelor's Degree from Cornell University. His extensive career encompasses diverse state and federal cases, resulting in substantial client recoveries, and he actively engages in legal associations while frequently lecturing on legal topics.

Full Bio
Michael S. Porter
Legally Reviewed on March 27, 2024
Michael S. Porter
Personal Injury Attorney

Originally from Upstate New York, Mike built a distinguished legal career after graduating from Harvard University and earning his juris doctor degree from Syracuse University College of Law. He served as a Captain in the United States Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps, gaining expertise in trial work, and is now a respected trial attorney known for securing multiple million-dollar results for his clients while actively participating in legal organizations across Upstate NY.

Full Bio
This page was legally reviewed by Michael S. Porter on March 27, 2024. Our experts verify everything you read to make sure it's up to date. Read our editorial guidelines or contact us.