The Porter Law Group recently secured a settlement in a significant medical malpractice case involving a physician's failure to recommend potentially life-saving lung cancer screening, which ultimately led to a patient's untimely death. The case highlights the critical importance of following established medical guidelines for early cancer detection and the devastating consequences when these standards of care are not met.
Has Your Health Suffered Due to Medical Negligence?
Let us fight for the justice and compensation you deserve. Contact us today for a free, non-obligatory case evaluation.
The case centered around the physician's failure to recommend low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer between 2016 and 2019, despite the patient meeting all the established criteria for such screening. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force had published clear guidelines in 2013 recommending LDCT screening for patients aged 55 or older with a 30-pack-year smoking history who had smoked within the last 15 years. These guidelines were widely accepted and endorsed by major medical organizations.
During multiple annual physical examinations spanning from 2016 to 2019, the treating physician documented the patient's status as a former smoker but failed to inquire about the extent of their smoking history or recommend LDCT screening. Had proper screening been implemented, experts assert that the cancer likely would have been detected at an early, treatable stage. Instead, the cancer wasn't discovered until it had reached Stage IV, at which point curative treatment was no longer possible.
The legal team assembled compelling evidence demonstrating that the physician was aware of the screening guidelines but inexplicably failed to follow them. During deposition testimony, the physician admitted to knowing about the Task Force recommendations but revealed an arbitrary practice of only recommending screening to current smokers, not former smokers – a distinction that experts testified had no medical justification and violated the standard of care.
The case was particularly poignant as the patient had a documented history of compliance with all other recommended cancer screenings. Medical experts testified that had LDCT screening been offered, the patient would likely have undergone the procedure, potentially leading to early detection and successful treatment. Instead, the patient endured more than two years of aggressive treatments and considerable suffering before passing away.
The impact on the family was profound. The patient's spouse lost their life partner of nearly 30 years, and their adult child lost a parent. Perhaps most heartbreaking was that the patient, upon learning of their terminal diagnosis, set a goal to meet their first grandchild but passed away just two months before the baby's birth.
The investigation revealed substantial economic damages, including over $340,000 in lost household services. More significantly, the case highlighted the immeasurable personal losses suffered by the family, including loss of companionship, guidance, and support.
This settlement serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of following established medical guidelines and the devastating consequences when healthcare providers fail to meet the standard of care. It also emphasizes the critical role of preventive screening in improving cancer outcomes when properly implemented.
For individuals who may have concerns about their medical care or screening recommendations, it's essential to be proactive in discussions with healthcare providers about cancer screening options. The Porter Law Group continues to advocate for patients and families affected by medical negligence, working to ensure that preventable tragedies like this one don't happen to others.
If you or a loved one has concerns about medical care received or screening recommendations that weren't provided, it's important to seek legal consultation to understand your rights and options. Medical standards exist to protect patients, and healthcare providers must be held accountable when they fail to meet these essential standards of care.
